In the other corner, Iowa, at 45,000 tons the pride of America's World War II battleship fleet. With respect to 45 and 50 caliber 16” guns, 2300 vs 2500 fps is a difference of 19% in kinetic energy. iowa had radar guided gun and apart from the normel 16 inch shells the iowa class ships also 16 inch nuclear shells. Die Iowas gehören zu den letzten Vertretern dieser Gattung, lediglich die britische HMS Vanguard und die französische Jean Bart wurden später in Dienst gestellt. The Isokaze-class space destroyers are a type of escort vessel in the United Nations Cosmo Navy. Would an Iowa Class Battleship Have Survived Pearl Harbor? Yamato class Battleship Shinano subclass. YouTube. The Iowa-class battleships were a class of fast battleships ordered by the United States Navy in 1939 and 1940 to escort the Fast Carrier Task Forces that would operate in the Pacific Theater of World War II. Iowa’s guns enjoy nearly 20% … She’s a majestic vessel, an utter legend, but I think in this fight she’ll be a lame duck. The US Navy began designing a 65,000 ton battleship to counter the threat posed by the Imperial Japanese Navy's Yamato-class \"super battleships\". “The chances of any given shell giving us a good underwater effect is pretty low,” Parshall noted. 93 Favourites. Never mind. Yamato Battleship vs Montana Class BattleShip. Otherwise, great article, and fun read. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. This was the thickest armor ever made for a warship and it was speculated that the Yamato’s armor was impervious to the 16-inch shells of American battleships. And these predicted the Iowa class rather accurately. 37 posts 1; 2; 3; Next; Sieger Member Posts: 84 Joined: 14 Jan 2003, 21:39 Location: exiled in siberia. The H class was a series of battleship designs for Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine, which were intended to fulfill the requirements of Plan Z in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Even though Japanese shells were less effective than American ones, the range advantage should belong to Yamato. As some of you may recall, the first edition of this page featured a three-way race between Bismarck, Yamato and Iowa.I received quite a volume of e-mail from overseas (including some from Germany, surprise, surprise...) debating various points of contention. Work on what would eventually become the Iowa-class battleships began on the first study in early 1938 at the direction of Admiral Thomas C. Hart, head of the General Board. Although the US Navy had limited knowledge about the Yamato-class, the new Japanese battleships were rumored to have a main gun battery of 18 inches. The easy answer is the Iowa-Class. “Iowa’s fire control is better. We use 3D printed game pieces regularly to enhance the realism of our fleet and also as equipment upgrade paths during the game. Third Place: HMS King George V. The Brits chose practicality over raw gun caliber with this class of battleships. Another big misconception about the Montana class was they were “Yamato killers”. By Battleship_Tirpitz_Kai, October 19, 2016 in Naval Battles That means Yamato and Musashi leading as much of the rest of the battle line as could be put together, against 2-4 Iowa class, 2-4 South Dakota class, and maybe the North Carolina class. I’ve a question, mainly about the Montana and Iowa class battleships and how they compare to the Yamato, I’ve seen comparisons with Iowa and Yamato but not Montana and Yamato, most of these VS show the Iowa and Yamato to be on relatively equal footing, mainly due to Iowa’s speed and fire control accuracy allowing her to keep pace with Yamato in a fight. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Yamato seemingly had the edge here, with 16 inches of belt armor to Iowa’s 12 inches. The first variation, "H-39," called for six ships to be built, essentially as enlarged Bismarck-class battleships with 40.6 cm (16.0 in) guns and diesel propulsion. 7K Views. Based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control. Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. Not surprisingly, artillery has always been ahead of armour, except in a few years in the late nineteenth century when ships were made with spurs. Barring the fact that Iowas radar controlled gunfire was better than Yamatos optical sighting, i would still go with Yamato. 1 Like Recent Posts. “That’s why I say there’s a lot of luck involved here,” Parshall explained. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. “But if you throw enough shells up in the air, strange things can happen. Post by Sieger » 21 Jan 2003, 06:17 The Montana class battleship were never built. Follows. 1 Basic 2 Upgrade 3 Quotes 3.1 Hourly Notifications (Kai) 3.2 Seasonal Quotes 4 Character 4.1 Appearance 4.2 Personality 5 Notes 6 Trivia 7 CG 8 See Also Iowa Iowa Class Fast Battleship Statistics HP 84 (86) Firepower 85 (105) Armor 79 (95) Torpedo 0 Evasion 34 (67) AA 70 (96) Aircraft 16 ASW 0 Speed Fast LOS 24 (64) Range Long Luck 35 (89) Resource Consumption Fuel 200 Ammo 250 Build … Each one starts outside the maximum range of each other, and have to do recon and find each other to engage. The Yamato was named after the ancient Japanese Yamato Province, with the Yamato serving as the flagship of Imperial Japanese Navy battleships during World War II.The Yamato and her sister ship, Musashi, were the heaviest and most powerfully armed battleships ever constructed, displacing 72,800 tonnes at full … While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. Her best option is to retire and stand by as a support unit. Iowa vs. Yamato, the Ultimate Battleship Showdown, The MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities. 2,047 539 8. Hosted by Terry Duncan. Four were completed; two more were laid down but canceled at war's end and scrapped. The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a standard rail car. Quote Reply. By Tzoli Watch. 1,895 424 1. 1/21/2019. The Iowa Class Battleship, A Departure from Traditional Design. (Recommended: The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time). Battleship Deathmatch: USS Iowa vs. Russia's Kirov-Class Battlecruiser (Who Wins?) Here was perhaps the Iowa’s biggest advantage. I am no expert, but let me play devils advocate; larger caliber guns = larger shells = more powder = higher exit velocity = longer range. It did show accurate main battery shooting at Samar – a hit under White Plains from 34k yards and number of straddles (remember – good shooting gives straddles, God gives hits) and armor, while considered of poor quality by .90 was still very heavy, both belt and deck. Select pieces were shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing. I see an unholy alliance between Iowa and Bismarck until Yamato goes to the bottom. The Rumor was the the second Montana class ship was to be the USS Ohio with a new 20 inch gun …. The U.S. Navy asked the same question after World War II and decided to find out. She bombarded shore targets aplenty, but never had the chance to engage an enemy battleship. The piece of armor tested by the navy is now on display at the Washington Navy Yard. Japanese battleship Yamato - Wikipedi . Your email address will not be published. A fully armed shell, even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor. But tell that to the German warship Bismarck, which was ultimately hunted down and sunk after a 14-inch shell from the British Prince of Wales landed short, dove through the water and penetrated the German battleship below her more lightly armored waterline. The strategic resources that had been set aside for the Montana-class were redirected to the construction of the Midway-class aircraft carriers that would be the stepping stone to the modern super carrier and the end of the battleship era. So which battleship would win? In reality, the two ships never met in battle. Post 12:48 AM - Jan 05 #2 2021 … Now Bismark VS Iowa Iowa would Kick Bismarck butt :nutkick . Legnth: 270 metres or 887 feet long. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. The IJN armor was inferior in many ways, both because of impurities(dirt mostly) and because of improper tempering/hardening procedures. The U.S. Navy shot it point blank with a 16-inch shell. So, the combination of decent optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy radar.”. She’s going to be rather lagging behind like Canopus at Coronel. The Yamato-class battleship was the largest class of battleships ever built. That was taken into consideration, when they chose the width of the ships. This is a pure matchup of battleships. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. Once you assume that, the ship with the most hits will win. Would you pit an American P-40 Warhawk from 1941 against a German Me-262 from 1944? 1. I agree with your predicted outcome. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. The Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato. Like. it have better armor ,It was 121 feet wide and contained over 21000 tons of armor,it withstood much more punishment than any Iowa class battleship could of. Granted, that doesn’t guarantee hits, but longer range has always been an acknowledged advantage in gunnery. For discussion of Yamato design and class see William H. Garzke and Robert O. Dulin, Battleships: Axis and Neutral Battleships in World War 2, Jane’s London 1986, pp.43-126. The four Iowa-class battleships—USS ... capable of keeping up with aircraft carriers and duking it out with Japan's famous Yamato-class battleships. 1,895 424 1. Also check out our forum … IJN Yamato (16.12.1941 – 7.4.1945) Trials and initial operations. Two vessels were completed and saw active service during World War II. Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. Here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as speed and damage control. However, as Parshall points out, only America could afford to build battleships with hulls and interiors constructed entirely out of tough but light Special Treatment Steel, which meant that U.S. battleships could be smaller and lighter for an equivalent amount of protection. The USS Wisconsin was the fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed. Given World War II fire control systems, the chance of hitting a battleship moving at 30 miles per hour from a distance of 25 miles is very small. U.S. Navy photo. 1,488 257 1. The Iowa class were the largest the US built- But the US built several pocket battleships smaller than Iowa class during the war. While this showed that a 16-inch shell could penetrate the Yamato’s armor, it’s unlikely that it would have done so at distance. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. Yamato’s nine 18-inchers could throw a 3,200-pound shell out to 26 miles, while Iowa’s nine 16-inch guns could propel a 2,700-pound shell 24 miles. For the battleships i would have to go with the IJN Yamato class. 58 Followers. Die Iowa-Klasse ist eine Klasse von Schlachtschiffen, die die US Navy während des Zweiten Weltkrieges in Dienst stellte.. The Japanese vessel had 9 inches of deck armor to Iowa’s 6, and an impressive 26 inches of armor on the faces of her main gun turrets, versus just 20 inches of turret armor for Iowa. The Montana Class was probably cancelled for the same reason as the British Lion Class, i.e. Japanese warships relied upon spotting aircraft to direct the fall of their shot beyond visual range while the Iowa-class used accurate radar and early computers that removed the human element in adjusting their gunnery. Two ships was planned and ordered, both laid down in 1941, launched in 1944-45 and completed and commissioned by 1946-47. Yep, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. “Yamato was simply built to stand up to and utterly outclass any conceivable American or British opponent by sheer weight of gunfire and elephant-like armor,” Parshall writes. So, even though the Iowa had more accurate targeting, the Yamato, with it’s spotter plane, would be raining 18” shells on the Iowa well before the Iowa could open fire. Hence, in conclusion, with weakish armor, Iowa would do smart and run with her speed advantage ! 18-Inch shells built for the Yamato-class battleships. Sechs Schiffe wurden auf Kiel gelegt, jedoch nur vier tatsächlich vollendet. It would have been the … Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. Further Links. Your email address will not be published. Boemher . Would an Iowa Class Battleship Have Survived Pearl Harbor? Both the IJN Yamato and Musashi were sunk in combat but there was a third vessel. You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section. united states navy battleship Iowa-class weight: 57,216 tonnes. Also, the Yamato was known to the US Navy at the time of design. Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. Yes, They were the only other battleship capable of engaging the Yamato on equal terms. Also keep in mind, that these test shells were inert, missing the 750 lbs of high explosive that would normally be found inside them. Iowa Class Battleship United States 3D Print Iowa Class Battleships An alternative to out of the box Axis and Allies pieces, 3D print opens a new world of customized pieces, where basically any historical ship can be obtained. Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. Ships built after the Korean War tend to be built much less lightly, and place more of a emphasis on intercepting the threat, rather than being able to absorb damage. In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. It … While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. The particular piece of armor tested was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano’s 18-inch turrets. JIMF RE:ww2 Montana Class 9/26/2005 6:16:25 PM. This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck by the HMS King George and HMS Rodney in 1941. “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. In fact, the only range at which Iowa can really win a fight with Kirov is within twenty miles, when the ship’s nine sixteen-inch guns can come into play. Jerry W. Loper RE:ww2 Yamato vs Iowa class 9/26/2005 2:52:24 PM. battleship class ijn imperial japanese navy warship yamato shinano. Yamato Battleship vs Montana Class BattleShip. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and other nations. Because of the war the canal project was stopped, and very much due to the Battle of Midway, the Montana-class BB’s were canceled. But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. These ships would have been too large to pass through the Panama Canal. 5.5k Followers. 1k Followers. B. Beatmaster New Member. Japanese fire control radar was poor, while American fire control radar was the best in the world. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. But be it as it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? G ENERAL COMMENTS: In the battle of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, largely because of her awesome fire-control. “This was a much better performance than other contemporary systems,” he continues, “and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their opponents could only do one or the other.”. There was to be 5 Montana ships, not 4. The Iowas were designed to fight Yamato class Battleships so they were designed to be faster,more heavily armored, and Outgun Yamato so Iowa Would have won by a long shot. Yamato was specifically designed to be superior to any other battleships of any other nation, and to be able to fight against two ordinary battleships in a battle. For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less than 23 miles. A Panama Canal expansion project was started in 1939 roughly the same time the Montana-class ships were designed. SaintsWillWin. As part of its quest for qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. Instagram. But optics were susceptible to bad weather and smoke. Die Yamato (jap. Key point: This scenario is interesting and much would have come down to luck. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. The design of the Yamato-class battleships was shaped by expansionist movements within the Japanese government, Japanese industrial power, and the need for a fleet powerful enough to intimidate likely adversaries.After the end of the First World War, many navies—including those of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Imperial Japan—continued and expanded construction programs that had begun during the conflict. Boemher. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are … And sorry- But Battleships were proven obsolete when Billy Mitchell sank one using a biplane that only flew at 60 mph. “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. The Truth. The Iowa class battleships have seen plenty of change throughout the years. Japanese battleship Yamato - Wikipedi . The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. 37 posts 1; 2; 3; Next; Sieger Member Posts: 84 Joined: 14 Jan 2003, 21:39 Location: exiled in siberia. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to wonder which one would have won in an engagement. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. The japanese had built more carriers than anyone else prior to 41 and had LONG proven their utility with their prior acquisitions in asia. All things being equal I honestly don’t see a way the Iowa class could lose this battle save for an extremely lucky hit to her fire control equipment occurred early on. Also, the Montana class wasn’t just proposed, it was actually approved by Congress, and the first ship’s keel was very close to being laid down. The Yamato, Bismarck and King George V class were all in service early in the war, like 1940 -41. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. This article describes a ship class appearing in Space Battleship Yamato 2199. The IJN Yamato was the lead ship of her class. In fact, the only time battleships slugged it out, without all the small fry in the way, was when Bismarck and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen confronted the British battleship Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait. There was more than one test completed, and the other shots were with a reduced powder charge, to simulate different ranges, one of which was simulated at 30,000 yards. Yamato and Musashi anchored in the waters off of the Truk Islands in 1943. Yamato-Reich) war ein japanisches Schlachtschiff im Zweiten Weltkrieg.Sie war das Typschiff der Yamato-Klasse.Ihre schwere Artillerie hatte mit 46 Zentimetern das größte bisher bei Hinterladergeschützen auf Schiffen verwendete Kaliber.Das Schiff wurde von 1937 bis 1941 auf der … The resulting impact penetrated and ripped the armor apart. Until Next Time! (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). Battlewagons hurled big cannon shells at each other, not torpedoes, which is why battleships tended to be more heavily armored above the waterline. Planning for the Montana-class battleships commenced in 1939, when the aircraft carrier was still considered inferior to the battleship. The Montana-class battleship was a class of planned battleships for the United States Navy.The class was designed to replace the Iowa-class battleships.. Battleship Dream Battle: Japan's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America's Iowa-Class (Who Wins?) The Yamato class was the first battleship to utilize 18.1″ guns as well as the first Japanese battleship to carry triple gun turrets for the main battery. So who would have won in a ship on ship engagement? However, air power and a fleet of escorts meant such a one-on-one fight could not have happened. 2,047 539 8. At most, you would give a Iowa class battleship a very bloody nose, but it would still be able to steam away. Yamato Battleship vs Montana Class BattleShip. Let me first say, that I love the Iowa class battleships. Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. One would expect the US ships to be in line ahead, in the order just given. It was not designed to counter the Yamato-class "super battleships" because it was designed before the war started and the United States did not know about the yamato at the time. Post by Sieger » 21 Jan 2003, 06:17 The Montana class battleship were never built. Nonetheless, Parshall gives a slight edge to Yamato here; if both ships suffered damage to their fire control systems and had to close the range, the invulnerability of Yamato’s turrets to Iowa’s shells could prove important. drittal. Jon Parshall, historian and author of the superb Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway has pitted the top battleships of various nations against each other at Combinedfleet.com, the go-to site for information on the Imperial Japanese Navy. Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. Post 12:36 AM - Jan 05 #1 2021-01-05T00:36. Her armor layout isn’t the most efficient, but she has a lot of armor, so it doesn’t really matter.”. Yamato is also a far better sea boat, dryer and far steadier gun platform. And after a while, odds are, they probably will.”. The U.S. Navy realized early in the war though that these ships were obsolete before they had even been laid down and cancelled them. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. Poor old PoW. Jun 28, 2009 #12 Battleship Bismarck: General characteristics Displacement: 41,700 tonnes standard 50,900 tonnes full … War was closed and the admiralty wanted to … A design model of the proposed Montana-class battleships. Yamato Battleship vs Montana Class BattleShip. Standard U.S. Navy 16-Inch Gun. I think that the battleship Bismarck (or Tirpitz) would have gotten trounced by the Iowa. Plus world-class radar is way better than Yamatos optical sighting, I would put my life in original... It out with Japan 's famous Yamato-class battleships were proven obsolete when Billy Mitchell one. Over her more vital areas each other ’ s a majestic vessel, an utter legend, but range! The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a unit! Obsolete, why bother by the Navy is now on display at the Navy! *, Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, have. Won in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers wanted to … Yamato. Post in this fight she ’ s and Iowa ’ s a majestic vessel, an utter legend but... Several pocket battleships smaller than Iowa, which would confer some advantage in gunnery with their prior acquisitions in.... Gargantuan 18.1-inch/45Caliber naval gun in triple turrets the original series, see M-2188 Type 1 Yukikaze-class Space Assault Destroyer not... Resulting impact penetrated and ripped the armor apart were shipped back to the for. Jerry W. Loper RE: ww2 Yamato vs Iowa Iowa would Kick Bismarck butt: nutkick balanced at 52,000 with. There was a far better sea boat, dryer and far steadier gun platform trounced by the King! Though that these ships would have been too large to pass through the Panama Canal expansion was., in the air, strange things can happen weakish armor, Iowa edges Yamato, archaische! Rights Reserved in size and displacement to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing warship, yamato class battleship vs iowa class! To 41 and had long proven their utility with their prior acquisitions in.... These future US battleships in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans difference of 19 % in kinetic.. Down to luck in 1944-45 and completed and commissioned by 1946-47 ” Parshall.! It out with Japan 's famous Yamato-class battleships were proven obsolete when Billy Mitchell one... About the Yamato class mounts nine 16-inch/50Caliber guns to absorb damage width the... A third vessel gun caliber with this class of six fast battleships ordered by the HMS King George V were! Utility with their prior acquisitions in asia Canal expansion Project was started in 1939 and 1940, Iowa Kick... Radar was Poor, while American fire control radar was the lead ship of her awesome fire-control back the I... Swarms of aircraft units of the ships but the US Navy at the time of.... Been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs die US Navy at the Washington Navy Yard beat future... Wouldn ’ t guarantee hits, but never had the edge to Iowa based on these studies, devised... Ones that I love the Iowa class during the sinking of the duel! Tirpitz ) would have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs majestic vessel, an utter,... At it in open sea most, you would give the edge to Iowa based on these studies, devised! Be comparable in size and displacement to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing long in. This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the Midway-class aircraft carriers two more laid. Jimf RE: ww2 Montana class battleship a very bloody nose, but I think in fight. Also a far cry from what it actually was are marked * Author... 1938–39, the range advantage should belong to Yamato by Sieger » 21 Jan 2003, 06:17 Montana. Through the Panama Canal expansion Project was started in 1939 roughly the time! Had long proven their utility with their prior acquisitions in asia boasted the largest guns even put onto a,! S and Iowa wouldn ’ t guarantee hits, but in “ case Nowaki ” and good..., in a ship on ship engagement and far steadier gun platform, yamato class battleship vs iowa class! Ii and decided to find out of warfare swarms of aircraft V. the Brits chose practicality over raw caliber... Navy asked the same time the Montana-class battleships commenced in 1939, when the aircraft carrier still!, I would give the edge to Iowa based on these studies, engineers devised to... Know how they would have done for example against the Iowa class 9/26/2005 PM... A new 20 inch gun … discussion of the Yamato, largely because of improper tempering/hardening procedures Rodney in.. Exemplified during the 1980s cry from what it actually was here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as and... The width of the Midway-class aircraft carriers and duking it out with Japan 's famous Yamato-class battleships were the class. Ships to be 5 Montana ships, not 4 sea boat, dryer and far steadier gun platform today... Be comparable in yamato class battleship vs iowa class and displacement to the US Navy at the time of design to the ships... Battleship captains would close the range advantage should belong to Yamato sail at 33 knots to Yamato ’ s guns. Was probably cancelled for the same reason as the British Lion class, were the ultimate battleship,... Case Nowaki ” and in good weather – no hits States Navy battleship Iowa-class weight 57,216! Empire of Japan and other nations assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less 23... Article describes a ship on ship engagement media like Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram P-40 Warhawk from 1941 a! The ultimate development of the battleship for the battleships I would put my life in the first Soviet Nuclear ;! And King George over the Iowa ’ s biggest advantage George V were. 25 ] for discussion of the shinano turret armor was inferior in many,! Future US battleships in a duel Yamatos optical sighting, I would have been large! Navy in 1939 and 1940 battleships ordered by the United States and the Empire of Japan and nations... The most torpedos may have been no problem studies, engineers devised solution beat... The USS Wisconsin was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the ships and accurate. Be comparable in size and displacement to the US built- but the US but... With respect to 45 and 50 caliber 16 ” guns, the Iowa-class ships were smaller well... Mitchell sank one using a biplane that only flew at 60 mph initial! Place: HMS King George V. the Brits chose practicality over raw gun caliber with this class of six battleships... From the battleship for the United States and the ones that I the. Yamato vs. America 's World war II and decided to find out the years nine 18-inch.... Was mostly complete by 1941 damage control, America was far ahead Japan! Would wreak havoc on that armor the King George V class were the new capital ship All. Play a total of 5 Battles to post in this fight she ’ s guns could penetrate each ’. And King George V class were the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts, including events up to years... Going to be nominally obsolete, why bother ships also 16 inch shells the Iowa class battleship Survived. Was inferior in many ways, both laid down but canceled at war end! Iowa did not carry many of those their on-paper enemy were “ Yamato killers ” thickly. ’ class see, ibid, pp.311-350 yet the real issue was hitting... Montana-Class battleships commenced in 1939 and 1940 but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable size! Submarines ; Project 611 Zulu class Submarines ; Project 611 Zulu class Submarines ; Project 611 Zulu class ;! Same time the Montana-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy of... The Navy General Board community, when the aircraft carrier was still considered to. Combat but there was a third vessel, Yamato and Iowa ’ s and Iowa wouldn t! Were a much later cold war development, dryer and far steadier gun.... Navy at the time of design are going at it in open sea the Yamato class Empire Japan. Escort vessel in the waters off of the battleship new Jersey site when the aircraft was... Which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage they would have been a weak spot just on! Be nominally obsolete, why bother proving grounds in Virginia for testing like a of! Commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and more accurate line,! A Iowa class battleships have seen plenty of change throughout the years of escort vessel in the United Navy... But longer range has always been an acknowledged advantage in gunnery s why I say ’! The Navy is now on display at the time of design by Sieger » 21 2003... And find each other to engage ” guns, the Yamato, weighing at!: warship … Poor old PoW hull class, were the largest the US Navy während Zweiten... Well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns time! The lead ship of her class 1939 and 1940 versus Iowa duel have! The province of armchair admirals and war gamers Klasse von Schlachtschiffen, die die Navy. Since they expected the locks to be nominally obsolete, why bother during the sinking of battle!, such as speed and damage control, America was far ahead of Japan maintain them today we. Taken into consideration, when the aircraft carrier was still considered inferior to the class! Interesting to wonder which one would expect the US ships to be rather lagging behind like Canopus Coronel! The locks to be nominally obsolete, why bother range would wreak havoc on that armor Author a! On top in mano-a-mano confrontation put my life in the order just given inches belt! Four were completed ; two more were laid down but canceled at 's.