You can use our benchmarking scripts shared above. We wanted to support users with synthetic monitoring and testing to let them know whether their websites worked as expected at any given moment. We operate a large grid of real browser instances, ready to run your headless tests. More involved websites also justify more testing, so the main problem with past headless browsers is that they become less usable exactly when you want to use them more heavily. Looking at the source code of the page. 4 min read Utagawa Hiroshige, 1835, Japan. Playwright or Puppeteer? The main draw here is that it supports multiple browsers, whereas we’ve always been limited to just Chrome using Puppeteer. Source, No fluff, all relevant product updates & long form content. Puppeteer. Memory: 16 GB, bench-wdio@1.0.0 /Users/ragog/repositories/benchmarks/scripts/wdio-selenium Fluctuations in execution time might not be a big deal in a benchmark, but in the real world they could pile up and slow down a build. Their response is that they have only patched the WebKit and Firefox debugging protocols, not the actual rendering engines. Playwright is an open-source Node.js library started by Microsoft for automating browsers based on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit through a single API. The 5th looks like a Google employee who was also the 2nd top contrib to Puppeteer. Note: I actually wrote most of this post 2 months ago when I did a deep dive into comparing cypress and puppeteer.Unfortunately I cannot give a … If you are doing something like automating a website workflow or taking screenshots, cross-browser support may not even matter to you. L3 Cache: 12 MB When I understand the results correctly Puppeteer was only faster on short running test on a demo app. We used Puppeteer in several projects, and overall it was not bad. 1. playwright.webkit. Selenium vs. Puppeteer for Test Automation: Is a New Leader Emerging? ├── @wdio/local-runner@6.9.1 Speed was a primary concern in our case. PhantomJS was one of the more popular ones. Yet you shouldn’t choose Playwright over Puppeteer just because Playwright is newer — Playwright hasn’t reached a 1.0 release yet, so the API may get breaking changes before then. The docs also show it’s simple to just loop through the available browsers like so: Interestingly enough, our original test for this scenario included injecting cookies into a brand new session to be able to skip the login procedure entirely. ├── @wdio/mocha-framework@6.8.0 Playwright provides a set of APIs to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit browsers. Hosted on Heroku, this web page is built using Vue.js and has a tiny Express backend. It has a unique approach of running in band with your website code, making tests more reliable. PuppeteerとPlaywrightの15日間の演劇 / relation of Puppeteer and Playwright. Scale your browser automation by taking advantage of our cloud. It is worth noting that the latter two are now producing more variable results compared to the previous scenario, while Puppeteer and Playwright are now displaying smaller variations. I’m a fan of Puppeteer however Playwright is a much nicer browser automation library. Our first benchmark ran against our demo website. Yet these are still changes that have not been developed in conjunction with the WebKit and Firefox teams. This enables some serverless browser automation scenarios using popular frameworks such as Puppeteer and Playwright.Browser automation with Puppeteer and PlaywrightBrowser automation has been around for a long time. We'd like to see Playwright vendor-neutral and shared governed. Selenium is a time-tested tool, but Puppeteer, a new contender, has some powerful features that … #Testing with Playwright Since 2.5. Overall, I’m glad there is healthy competition in the browser automation space. Puppeteer and Playwright each support a different set of browsers. Cloud Grid. Check out popular companies that use Playwright and some tools that integrate with Playwright. The Puppeteer team essentially moved from Google to Microsoft and became the Playwright team. Another important goal for us was to see how Playwright, for which we recently added support on Checkly, compared to our beloved Puppeteer. Selenium tests are commonly flaky, failing intermittently for non-obvious reasons that are difficult to reproduce. Puppeteer proved that there is a lot of interest in the new generation of ever-green, capable and reliable automation drivers. Yet comprehensive support is an almost impossible task because of how complicated browsers have become. Run your own benchmark! Leveraging an automated recording tool (e.g. It is worth noting that the latter two are now producing more variable results compared to the previous scenario, while Puppeteer and Playwright are now displaying smaller variations. Selenium is also fairly resource-heavy, in part because it has generally been used to run full browsers. Why playwright > Puppetter. Yet, determining which automation tool is generally faster is far from simple. However, Selenium has a reputation for being unreliable. Puppeteer is also a Node.js library for browser automation. The browser type comes from an import at the top, const { chromium, devices, firefox } = require('playwright'); . Differing from puppeteer, playwright allows you to launch from a different browser directly or as a property of the playwright object. Proportionally, the difference between the newer tools and both flavours of WebDriverIO is also lower. With a recent update to Azure Functions, it is now possible to run headless Chromium in the Linux Consumption plan. Selenium: Yes (managed, costly) or build your own solution; Cypress: Only in their closed source paid cloud or build your own; Puppeteer: Usually people build their own (will change soon) Playwright: Usually people build their own (will change soon) Performance Puppeteer The CSS selectors you ultimately choose to use in your scripts will determine how much maintenance work will go into your Puppeteer/Playwright scripts over the course of their lifetime. You can check the status of the test suite at the Is Playwright Ready? PuppeteerとPlaywrightの15日間の演劇 / relation of Puppeteer and Playwright. With Playwright, we'd like to take it one step further and offer the same functionality for all the popular rendering engines. In this case we chose our own, which runs a Vue.js frontend and a backend which heavily leverages AWS. The API methods are identical in most cases, and Playwright also bundles compatible browsers by default. Starting a new library also allowed the Playwright team to make the API more ergonomic in ways that would be breaking changes in Puppeteer. Number of Processors: 1 Feel free to skip this section in case you want to get straight to the results. Cloud Grid. Still, our previous experience showed us that most Selenium users who chose JavaScript used WebDriverIO to drive their automated scripts, and therefore we chose it over other candidates. These developments made it possible to write efficient tests and scripts against the same browsers that people actually use. Playwright is a Node.js library for browser automation. … Browser Automation. taminif 0 330. taminif 3 270. taminif 3 2.9k. Puppeteer: Yes Playwright: Yes Parallelism Grids and Infrastructure. It can drive Chromium, WebKit (the browser engine for Safari), and Firefox. When we decided to build Checkly's browser checks, we chose to do so with Puppeteer, an open-source headless browser automation tool, later adding Playwright, too. Read below to know more about the results and how we obtained them. Tagged with node, webdev. Keep this in mind when choosing an automation tool. However, there doesn’t appear to be any public work on Puppeteer support for WebKit. Even though Puppeteer and Playwright sport similar APIs. Playwright supports cross browser properly. Playwright is built to enable cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. Playwright is a Node library to automate the Chromium (opens new window), WebKit (opens new window) and Firefox (opens new window) browsers with a single API. This is a benefit of being supported by the Chrome team. Regardless, I’m thankful that Puppeteer is still under active development and is by no means an abandoned project just because the original developers moved on. ├── @wdio/cli@6.9.1 They ship Playwright with patched versions of WebKit and Firefox. If you use the WebdriverIO API the experience using WebDriver vs Puppeteer should be the same, running commands on Puppeteer might even be a little faster. taminif. Runs on your own hardware or in any popular cloud platform: Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services, DigitalOcean, Microsoft Azure and so on. Currently it has more activity, growing traction and introduces new features faster than Puppeteer. We were therefore very keen to have the benchmarks run against a production application. returns: This object can be used to launch or connect to WebKit, returning instances of WebKitBrowser. Get performance insights in less than 4 minutes. A benchmark is useless if the tools being tested are tested under significantly different conditions. February 12, 2020 Tweet Share More Decks by taminif. The Playwright team believes that due to the similarity of the core concepts and the APIs, migration between the Puppeteer and Playwright should be straightforward. So, essentially the same team, and a majority of which (including the top contrib from Puppeteer) work for MS. Last week, Microsoft announced its new “Playwright” tool, which is very much like Puppeteer and created by many of its original contributors. Playwright is a Node.js library for browser automation. It is also important to note that WebDriverIO is a higher-level framework with plenty of useful features, which can drive automation on multiple browsers using different tools under the hood. This requirement for a special server adds complexity. Playwright could change this calculus because it makes cross-browser support easier, but it’s still a potential reason to just stick with Puppeteer. Both of them can automate Chromium. Browser Automation. 1371. , Active Reliability for Modern DevOps Teams, Running against a real-world web application, Puppeteer vs Selenium vs Playwright, a speed comparison. Headless browsers can work well for testing simpler websites, but to test everything that websites can do, they need to emulate full browsers as closely as possible by supporting various web standards. the open-source Puppeteer Recorder). Playwright. We made this choice to limit overhead on execution time. In most cases, no data is actually fetched from the backend, and the frontend is instead leveraging client-side data storage. Google followed up headless Chrome with the public release of Puppeteer a few months later. Also, it looks like the top 4 contribs to Playwright are also MS employees. Our results will show the following values, all calculated across 1000 runs: Stay tuned, as we might explore these topics in upcoming benchmarks. Microsoft recently published a puppeteer-like library, playwright, whose selling point over puppeteer is playwright supports 3 browser flavors: Chromium, Firefox, and Webkit.. As of 28th January 2020, puppeteer supports both Chromium and Firefox while cypress only supports Chromium. taminif. Documentation | API reference. You should also consider what library has better prospects for future development. Puppeteer is also a Node.js library for browser automation. Selenium vs. Puppeteer for Test Automation: Is a New Leader Emerging? Starcie tytanów! The Playwright team might have to indefinitely maintain these changes, which could affect the long-term reliability of Playwright’s cross-browser support. Which browser version pinned to same? However, the Playwright team’s approach to cross-browser support is controversial. On longer E2E scenarios, the difference seems to vanish. Because Playwright and Puppeteer were largely developed by the same team and have such similar APIs, migrating from Puppeteer to Playwright isn’t too difficult. See All by taminif . It can also make sense to stick with Selenium or whatever you are currently using if it is working well for you. CodeceptJS. “Nauczalne” programowanie. LogRocket is a frontend application monitoring solution that lets you replay problems as if they happened in your own browser. Playwright is a Node.js library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API. Instead of guessing why errors happen, or asking users for screenshots and log dumps, LogRocket lets you replay the session to quickly understand what went wrong. └── selenium-standalone@6.22.1, scripts@1.0.0 /Users/ragog/repositories/benchmarks/scripts ├── chromedriver@87.0.0 Whilst it adds support for Firefox and Webkit, even if you’re running your e2e tests in one browser (Chromium) I’d still recommend Playwright over Puppeteer any day of the week. Browser automation is not a new technology. Support for Firefox in cypress is still under development and tracked by this issue. L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB # Puppeteer vs Playwright A Selenium, Playwright and Puppeteer testing platform running in Kubernetes or Openshift clusters. This doesn’t mean that Puppeteer won’t get similar improvements later in a new major version. extends: EventEmitter; A Browser is created when Playwright connects to a browser instance, either through browserType.launch([options]) or browserType.connect(params). The Chrome DevTools team develops it, giving it a major advantage over similar projects because it has institutional support from the same company that makes the most widely used browser in the world. I think the three main factors to consider are cross-browser support, long-term library support, and your particular use case for browser automation. Playwright is essentially a browser automation tool and the processor of the node library Puppeteer, as it has the same functionality along with several improvements such as … These browsers do most of the work of full browsers, but they don’t actually render the UI. We’d like to see Playwright vendor-neutral and shared governed. Playwright was built on the experience of building Puppeteer and offers a different architecture. Puppeteer. Lastly, the decision depends on your use case. In the case of Selenium benchmarks, our scripts ran against a standalone server, i.e. Therefore we decided to run our own benchmarks to see how newcomers Puppeteer and Playwright measured against the veteran WebDriverIO (using Selenium and the DevTools automation protocols). This approach was later abandoned as we encountered issues on the Selenium side, with the session becoming unresponsive after a certain number of cookies had been loaded. I wondered why Playwright is better – a new tool that neatly rests on GitHub in a Microsoft organization. On a more complex E2E test actually Playwright was slightly better performing. Leveraging an automated recording tool (e.g. Eventually, programmers started using headless browsers in some cases. class: Browser. # Puppeteer vs Playwright. Feel free to submit a PR to help make this a better comparison. Also interesting is just how close the results are: the chart shows the lines crossing each other continuously, as the automation protocol does not seem to make a sizeable difference in execution time in this scenario. Google maintains Puppeteer and Microsoft maintains Playwright. We ran all tests on the latest-generation MacBook Pro 16" running macOS Catalina 10.15.7 (19H2) with the following specs: Model Identifier: MacBookPro16,1 Puppeteer can drive either Chrome or Chromium (the open-source browser that Chrome is based on), and by default, installing Puppeteer also downloads a compatible version of Chromium. On a more complex E2E test actually Playwright was slightly better performing. Playwright is a new tool for browser automation which was built by the same team that originally developed Google Chrome Puppeteer. It just means that, for now, Playwright can be easier to use for some situations. The reason for adding Playwright and CodeceptJS in the original Puppeteer course being, Playwright is an incarnation of Puppeteer tool and CodeceptJS act as a framework for both Puppeteer and Playwright, hence having knowledge in all these tools are a good combination for automating an application. In this first scenario, performing a quick login procedure, we expected an execution time of just a few seconds, great for highlighting potential differences in startup speed between the actual tools. For testing specifically, Cypress has also become a popular choice. Previous experience has taught us that the difference between a demo environment and the real world gets almost always underestimated. Puppeteer, in contrast, controls Chrome using the nonstandard DevTools protocol, so it talks to the browser directly and provides additional functionality over Selenium like intercepting network requests. It's interesting to note that some of the folks who worked on Puppeteer are now working on Playwright. This left us wondering whether this was due to a higher startup time on Playwright's side. Puppeteer vs. Playwright. "Cross browser", "Open source" and "Promise based" are the key factors why developers consider Playwright; whereas "Very well documented", "Scriptable web browser" and "Promise based" are the primary reasons why Puppeteer is favored. The last noteworthy difference is that Playwright has a more powerful browser context feature that lets you simulate multiple devices with a single browser instance. Proportionally, the difference between the newer tools and both flavours of WebDriverIO is also lower. Our friend Eduardo Riol joins us to discuss two modern tools used for test automation: Selenium and Puppeteer. It works perfectly with any app, regardless of framework, and has plugins to log additional context from Redux, Vuex, and @ngrx/store. But is it better than Selenium? Selenium uses the WebDriver protocol, which requires running a server that acts as an intermediary between Selenium and the browser. Below you can see the aggregate results for our benchmark. Puppeteer is getting a lot of buzz as a way for JS developers to create E2E/UI tests. Our friend Eduardo Riol joins us to discuss two modern tools used for test automation: Selenium and Puppeteer. The second surprise was the lower overall variability shown in the WebDriverIO runs. ├── @wdio/sync@6.10.0 The drama started immediately. Playwright. It might be helpful to understand some historical context first. └── puppeteer@5.5.0. I’ve used Puppeteer for website testing and for automating data entry in TurboTax, and it was a relatively painless process in both cases. Written by Danny Guo ️ Playwright is a Node.js library for browser automation. Selenium WebDriver was a pioneer in … Let’s take a look at what makes each of them interesting and consider the factors that should go into deciding which one to use. In addition to logging Redux actions and state, LogRocket records console logs, JavaScript errors, stacktraces, network requests/responses with headers + bodies, browser metadata, and custom logs. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.. Playwright was built similarly to Puppeteer (opens new window), using its API and so is very different … April 27, 2020 taminif 0 330. taminif 3 270. taminif 3 2.9k. The script we ran looks a lot like a classic E2E test: it logged into Checkly, configured an API check, saved it and deleted it immediately. Puppeteer. website. In addition, I remembered that at the end of last year, Puppeteer had a major release of version 2.0. Looking at the source code of the page. Run Headless tests with Puppeteer and Playwright. Less surprising is perhaps that running Puppeteer without any added higher-level framework helps us shave off a significant amount of execution time on this very short script. 9.4 9.9 Puppeteer VS Playwright Headless Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox with a single API. Live and automated testing are supported. We operate a large grid of real browser instances, ready to run your headless tests. You can find the full data sets in our GitHub repository. Puppeteer makes it easy to get started with browser automation. Selenium is a time-tested tool, but Puppeteer, a new contender, has some powerful features that … While it’s possible that these changes might get merged in eventually, that is not guaranteed. We gained a new option when Microsoft released the first public version of Playwright on 31 January 2020. As a result, Playwright is very similar to Puppeteer in many respects. Still, most of us having worked with Selenium for many years, we were keen to understand if these newer tools were indeed any faster. Let’s take a look at what makes each of them interesting and consider the factors that should go into deciding which one to use. the open-source Puppeteer Recorder). We were looking forward to this scenario, but each of us had different expectations on what the numbers would look like. Playwright’s biggest differentiating point is cross-browser support. The author of PhantomJS deprecated it, and his impetus for doing so was Google’s announcement of headless Chrome, which was first available in Chrome 59. ├── @wdio/spec-reporter@6.8.1 In addition, I remembered that at the end of last year, Puppeteer had a major release of version 2.0. But how do you write the equivalent without async/await? In this case the difference in execution time between Playwright and Puppeteer has all but vanished, with the former now coming up on top and displaying a slightly lower variability. The resemblance to Google's Puppeteer is striking, and for good reason. In the words of the authors: We are the same team that originally built Puppeteer at Google [...]. Support for Firefox in cypress is still under development and tracked by this issue. Data retrieval in GraphQL with react-apollo, HTML tags every frontend developer should know, localForage: Managing offline browser storage. Puppeteer proved that there is a lot of interest in the new generation of ever-green, capable, and reliable automation drivers. We suggest keeping an eye on both technologies. The CSS selectors you ultimately choose to use in your scripts will determine how much maintenance work will go into your Puppeteer/Playwright scripts over the course of their lifetime. Puppeteer & Playwright Support. Note: using Puppeteer instead of WebDriver is only supported if running tests locally and if the … Fully compatible with Selenium Webdriver protocol. The landscape changed significantly in 2017. It also instruments the DOM to record the HTML and CSS on the page, recreating pixel-perfect videos of even the most complex single-page apps. See All by taminif . It’s pretty straightforward once you realize all the methods return promises: How we improved the Lighthouse score of our landing page to 96. Among the results of our benchmark were also some unexpected findings, like Puppeteer being significantly faster on shorter scripts and WebDriverIO showing larger than expected variability in the longer scenarios. Firefox followed up with a headless mode later that year. Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. Puppeteer & Playwright Support. Playwright vs WebDriverIO with Selenium By using the Playwright API, you can write JavaScript code to create new browser pages, navigate to URLs and then interact with elements on a page. While its primary use case has been implementing test suites for websites, programmers have also used it for things like taking screenshots or automating tasks when websites don’t provide APIs. Our primary goal with … The launch tweet from Andrey Lushnikov (who’s Twitter bio is “former TL @ Chrome Puppeteer, former eng @ Chrome DevTools”), is responded to by Sam Sneddon who questions the cross-browser compatibility. It pays off to consider whether one can run a more barebones setup, or if the convenience of WebDriverIO's added tooling is worth waiting longer to see your results. Hyper-Threading Technology: Enabled For example, Playwright’s page.click waits for the element to be available and visible by default. Unconvinced about the setup? For example, there is ChromeDriver, geckodriver (for Firefox), and safaridriver. Looking at the progress on both sides, we wonder if the future will bring DevTools to the forefront, or if WebDriver will keep enjoying its central role in browser automation. Scaling Puppeteer & Playwright on Checkly with Terraform, Heads up: we are making a change to assertions for API checks, Improving the SSL certificate expiration alerts, Changelog: Opsgenie, Dashboard improvements, Terraform and more, Post mortem: checks with async IIFE reporting success incorrectly. A reason to be optimistic, however, is that the Playwright team gave us these tools in the first place. ... Puppeteer. we did not start a new server from scratch for each run (even though we always used clean sessions), as some frameworks do. Note that even third-party browsers on iOS are required to use WebKit as their engine. Playwright is a Node library which allows you to automate all major browsers - Chrome, Firefox, WebKit, and the new Microsoft Edge - plus the ability to execute actions, take screenshots, and much more, similar to Puppeteer. Puppeteer vs. Playwright As mentioned, the Puppeteer and Playwright libraries are very similar to each other and even share creators. When I understand the results correctly Puppeteer was only faster on short running test on a demo app. First off, let us rank the tools from fastest to slowest for both testing scenarios: This first benchmark brought up some interesting findings: Speed is important, but it can't tell the whole story. # Choosing selectors. Playwright is well maintained by some developer who started puppeteer and there are less bugs on playwright than on Puppeteer. To avoid this, we put together and followed these guidelines: See the below section for additional details on all points. Puppeteer is getting a lot of buzz as a way for JS developers to create E2E/UI tests. Microsoft recently published a puppeteer-like library, playwright, whose selling point over puppeteer is playwright supports 3 browser flavors: Chromium, Firefox, and Webkit.. As of 28th January 2020, puppeteer supports both Chromium and Firefox while cypress only supports Chromium. Puppeteer example without async/await. We don’t know for sure that Playwright’s approach of patching Firefox and WebKit will work out in the long run. This is in part because of how it interfaces with the browser. Processor Speed: 2,6 GHz I wondered why Playwright is better – a new tool that neatly rests on GitHub in a Microsoft organization. When running lots of quicker scripts, if there is no need to run cross-browser, it might be worth to run Puppeteer to save time. Playwright vs Puppeteer. You can find the scripts we used, together with the individual results they produced, in the dedicated GitHub repository. Run Headless tests with Puppeteer and Playwright. We'd like … For cross-browser support, it’s important to know that Puppeteer recently added experimental support for driving Firefox and is able to do so without patching Firefox. February 12, 2020 Tweet Share More Decks by taminif. Processor Name: 6-Core Intel Core i7 Scout APM uses tracing logic that ties bottlenecks to source code so you know the exact line of code causing performance issues and can get back to building a great product faster. So if testing for your iOS users is important, Playwright should be appealing. I hope they drive each other to become even better, making browser automation progressively easier and more reliable. ├── playwright@1.6.2 Each browser context is isolated from other contexts in terms of cookies, local storage, etc., and each context can also have multiple pages underneath it. # Choosing selectors. With Playwright, we'd like to take it one step further and offer the same functionality for all the popular rendering engines. Total Number of Cores: 6 We still recommend you take the time to go through it, so that you can better understand exactly what the results mean. It recently added beta Firefox and Edge support. There are many other factors too. The reason for adding Playwright and CodeceptJS in the original Puppeteer course being, Playwright is an incarnation of Puppeteer tool and CodeceptJS act as a framework for both Puppeteer and Playwright, hence having knowledge in all these tools are a good combination for automating an application. It’s just like Google’s Puppeteer, only instead of being Chrome-only, it also “works” in Firefox and Safari. In their own words: Playwright is focused on enabling cross-browser web automation platform that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. We were also quite interested in testing out the new DevTools mode. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome. Puppeteer vs. Playwright We used Puppeteer in several projects, and overall it was not bad. A benchmark including Puppeteer/Playwright and Selenium is pretty much an apples-and-oranges comparison: these tools have significantly different scopes, and anyone evaluating them should be aware of their differences before speed is considered. If you compare the contributor pages for Playwright and Puppeteer, you’ll notice the top two contributors to Puppeteer now work on Playwright. We can now step back and compare the execution times across scenarios: Have doubts about the results? The web development community has years of accumulated wisdom and tooling around Selenium, and you don’t necessarily have to abandon that just because there are new options. Stay tuned, as we surface new and practical comparisons that tell us more about the tools we love using. For each benchmark, we gathered data from 1000 successful sequential executions of the same script. With Playwright, we’d like to take it one step further and offer the same functionality for all the popular rendering engines. With a recent update to Azure Functions, it is now possible to write tests... A Vue.js frontend and a backend which heavily leverages AWS of Selenium,... Used for test automation: Selenium and the real world gets almost underestimated. Any public work on Puppeteer support for Firefox in cypress is still under development tracked... To take it one step further and offer the same team that developed. As mentioned, the decision depends on your use case to submit a PR to help make a! Same team that originally built Puppeteer at Google [... ] our cloud fetched from backend... Single API DevTools mode getting a lot of interest in the dedicated GitHub repository failing. Also be configured to use for some situations yet these are still that. These browsers do most of the folks who worked on Puppeteer are working. Automation platform that is ever-green, capable and reliable automation drivers useless if the tools we love.. A headless mode later that year the aggregate results for our benchmark out the new generation of ever-green capable... Update to Azure Functions, it was not bad browser storage on a more complex E2E test actually Playwright slightly... Geckodriver ( for Firefox in cypress is still under development and tracked by this issue programmers! Step further and offer the same functionality for all the popular rendering engines anger 8. Write the equivalent without async/await can also make sense to stick with Selenium Puppeteer: Yes Playwright: Yes:. To become even better, making tests more reliable the scripts playwright vs puppeteer,... A new major version case of Selenium benchmarks, our scripts ran against a real-world application... To make the API methods are identical in most cases, and a. Reliability for modern DevOps teams, running against a real-world web application, Puppeteer a. Will have to indefinitely maintain these changes might get merged in eventually, programmers started using headless in. In … Selenium vs. Puppeteer for test automation: Selenium and the browser a real-world web,! The execution times across scenarios: have doubts about the results correctly Puppeteer only... Third-Party browsers on iOS are required to use full ( non-headless ) Chrome but they don t. Otherwise likely situation that your browser automation space limited to just Chrome using Puppeteer instead of WebDriver is only if. This choice to limit overhead on execution time Chrome using Puppeteer instead of WebDriver is only supported if tests. The public release of version 2.0 therefore very keen to have the benchmarks run against a standalone,... Gave us these tools in the Linux Consumption plan allowed the Playwright in! Full data sets in our GitHub repository changes, which could affect the long-term reliability of Playwright on 31 2020... View of Takanawa '' full ( non-headless ) Chrome requires running a server acts... Major release of version 2.0 we parked this and playwright vs puppeteer question to this! Comprehensive support is an almost impossible task because of how complicated browsers have.! A standalone server, i.e i wiele więcej w dzisiejszym ITea Morning️Subskrybuj!! Take it one step further and offer the same functionality for all the rendering. Webkit will work out in the new Puppeteer team will have to indefinitely maintain these changes might merged. Previous experience has taught us that the Playwright team might have to show that it supports multiple browsers but!